AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Downloading Wipe Professional 2023.051/16/2024 to appoint the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and/or the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) as the bodies responsible for establishing an international accreditation system for peer review, I propose an independent body of scientists take on the task of peer review training in order to make the balance of peer review-related power and fortune fair and equitable. Rather than the suggestion made by Candal-Pedreira et al. Coupled with the mostly voluntary (i.e., unremunerative) nature of the peer review process, a broad range of peer reviewers of varying qualifications are entrusted with screening and approving the bulk of scientific knowledge in the most important scientific databases (e.g., PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus), and since the process is mostly not open, peer reviewers cannot be held directly accountable. noted, no international system of professionalization and accreditation exists. Their professional backgrounds and experience, either as researchers or as peer reviewers, vary widely. 1 I elaborate on the professionalization of peer reviewers. candidly discussed the challenges faced by peer review and the responsibilities of editors in ensuring that the peer-reviewed label is truthful.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |